Okoroji and Ayilaran |
A
Federal High Court siting in Lagos and presided over by Hon. Justice
Ibrahim Buba has ruled that the unapproved Musical Copyright Society of
Nigeria (MCSN) and its officers facing trial before the court should
answer to all the criminal charges brought against them by the Nigerian
Copyright Commission (NCC).
Delivering a ruling in charge No FHC/IKJ/CS/19/2012: NCC vs. MCSN, Mayowa
Ayilaran, Louis Udoh, Halim Mohammed, Banjo Omolara Biliqis, Yusuf Adogi Benson and Olakayode Ajayi, on Wednesday, November 27,
2013, the judge held that the filing of three separate charges against
MCSN and its officers was not an abuse of court process as claimed by
the accused persons and that the charges were properly filed by the NCC.
The judge held that the application of the accused persons challenging
the charges preferred against them was misconceived. He held that all
the allegations in the different charges were different and that there
is no iota of abuse of court process in the charges saying that the
charges are not defective in any way.
It will be recalled that following the arrest of
officers of MCSN on September 18, 2012 and subsequent investigation into
their activities, the Nigerian Copyright Commission filed 6 different
charges against MCSN and its officials in Lagos. In each of the charges,
MCSN and its officials were accused of performing the duties of a
collecting society without the approval of the NCC contrary to Section
39 of the Copyright Act. Each charge disclosed that MCSN performed the
duties of a collecting Society by demanding royalties from a particular
company and carrying on the business of soliciting and granting of
licenses on behalf of Copyright owners without the approval of the
Nigerian Copyright Commission and thereby committed an offence contrary
to and punishable under section 39 (4), (5) and (6) of the Nigerian
Copyright Act Cap C 28 LFN 2004.
MCSN
and each of the accused persons pleaded not guilty to the charge. The
accused persons then filed a motion challenging the charges preferred
against them. In the application, they argued that the charges where bad
in law claiming that the Commission should not have filed several
charges against them. They therefore urged the court to either strike
out the charge or stay the hearing of the charge until the other charges
were determined.
Prosecuting
counsel, Mr. Obi Ezeilo
on the other hand argued that the charges against the accused were not
bad for duplicity in the sense that each time the accused persons
demanded and collected royalty for usage of musical works without the
approval of the Commission, a separate offence is committed.
On
the issue of the constitutionality of Section 39 of the Copyright Act
also raised by lawyers to the accused, Mr. Ezeilo urged the Court to
dismiss their application because Section 39 of the Copyright Act is not
unconstitutional. He added that the same Federal High Court presided
over by Justice Mohammed Sanni in another suit brought by the same MCSN
against NCC had held that Section 39 of the Copyright
Act is constitutional. The NCC prosecutor further stated that the Court
of Appeal and the Supreme Court in Compact Disc Technologies vs. MCSN
also took the position that Section 39 of the Copyright Act is not
unconstitutional and that MCSN ought to comply with that provision. Mr.
Ezeilo urged the court to follow the decisions of the superior courts.
Following
the ruling, the case was adjourned to January 16, 20 and 22, 2014 for
hearing. In court for the accused persons during the ruling was Mr.
Charles Okoh of Wale Adesokan and Co.
No comments:
Post a Comment