Igwe |
Below
is the last interview revered journalist and the Associate Publisher of
Entertainment Express and Sunday Express Newspapers and my amiable boss, Pastor Dimgba
Igwe granted the publisher and editor-in-chief of Yes International magazine,
Azuh Arinze, in Katsina, on Thursday, August 28, 2014, at the 10th annual All
Nigerian Editors Conference.
What makes a good journalist?
A good journalist? Well, a good
journalist is somebody that has a sense of curiosity; somebody who ab initio
believes in a cause, a mission; it is like there is a driving force within you
that does not take something that is wrong; that wants things to be corrected.
Those are the innate propelling elements that drive a good journalist. A sense
of curiosity and then a sense of a mission and then there is also the element
of the skill. The person should have a lot of resilience. Journalism takes a
lot from you, so you have to be persistent. To get news, there are a lot of
frustrations, so you have to be persistent. And then I will say somebody who
also is substantially skeptical, somebody who doesn’t take everything, who is
not credulous, who doesn’t just take in everybody’s word for it. In fact, we
used to say that every morning, a journalist should; the same way you take a
cup of tea is the same way a journalist should take a cup of cynicism. So that
you have this cynical approach to the society. You don’t just believe things
because they say it is so and everybody believes in it. That, for instance, was
why I was asking yesterday when I was making a brief comment if the things the
Governor (Ibrahim Shema of Katsina) is saying are true. Because you cannot just
say they are true because he said them. So, those elements are critical
composites of a good journalist.
What makes a good editor?
A good editor need not be a very
good writer, but he should be a good manager, he should be a good motivator,
because a good editor is driving a team of people and he has a sense of where
the paper is going. So, he should be somebody who has a capacity to organize a
group of people, motivate them to achieve a goal. If you read the memoir of Ben
Bradly; Ben Bradly was the editor of Carl Benson and Bob Howard. Ben Bradly
said he never went to the Editorial Board; he didn’t visit all those places. He
said he was not particularly a good writer, but then he’s surrounded by these
star reporters and he’s a damn good manager, working with Karchan Graham. And,
he can make decisions. A good editor is like a coach. He knows who the stars
are. He may not necessarily play the game as well as the people he is leading,
but he knows where he wants them to be, he is driving them to achieve that
goal. Of course, it is an added bonus when he is also a good writer, because
you see, when you tell a man you have written nonsense; the only thing that
entitles you to say that is the fact that you, yourself have written something
credible. You have to earn whatever you are demanding from the reporters; from
your team members. You have to have earned it either by your performance or by
your past and so on and so forth. If I call Steve (Nwosu) or Femi (Adesina) and
co and say do it this way, the only reason they will believe me is because they
know I have done it myself. If I haven’t done it and I’m sitting there
pontificating, they are never going to believe me. So, credibility is going to
come from what you have done.
What makes a good story?
That’s a tough one. But a good story
should answer questions about the curiosity of people. A good story should have
the capacity to make somebody say aha! Do you mean it? Is that true? If the
person says is that true; elements of a good story should now be that you
answered those questions. Yes, it is true, this is why it happened, this is how
it happened, this is when. A good story should answer all the questions. When I
read your story and you leave me wondering, asking questions again, it means
you have not answered all the questions. So, the story is incomplete. When a story
is incomplete, a reader reads it and does not have a sense of totality; he then
makes up his mind whether to believe what he has read or not. But it should
answer all those questions.
What do you like most about being a
journalist?
Well, the sense of audacity. It
gives you a sense that you are part of those who could shape and re-shape the
society. It is the fact that in my own little corner, I can decide to have a
point of view, to have a perspective on how this society should be governed and
I dare say there are millionaires – people that are very rich – they don’t have
that kind of audacity. They can’t speak; I can! I can write, I can take a
position and I have the capacity also to affect the direction of the larger
society. It gives us excitement. You know we don’t usually have plenty money,
but it is not money that makes people come into journalism. Journalism is like
a vocation, it’s like people going into ministry, it’s like people going into
missionary work. When they were going, they were not going to become the
richest guys in the world, they were going because they had a call; there is an
inner propelling force saying this is what you should do. Sometimes they don’t
have money. I have a friend; the Bureau Chief of Chicago Tribune. He’s a
guy called Ray Long. He says I’m a Bureau Chief; I don’t want to go higher.
This is all I wanted. I don’t want anything more. I want to just be here as a
Bureau Chief until I die…
What don’t you like about being a
journalist?
In our materialistic environment, I
don’t like the fact that it doesn’t give you enough money to remove financial
insecurities from your life. Otherwise I don’t think of any other profession I
will like to be in. I like to be a journalist. There may be issues about the dangers
and all that. But I don’t bother myself about those ones. What I bother about
is the fact that the profession sometimes does not generate enough resources to
sustain its devotees.
What is the costliest mistake that
any journalist can make?
Writing deliberate falsehood. You
know in those days, Razor was writing stories that didn’t happen and
that killed Razor. The costliest mistake is to lose your credibility.
You see, the trading capital of the journalist is your name, it’s your
integrity. When that integrity is lost, then you have no business. You’ve lost
all!
What is the greatest thing that
being a journalist has done for you?
The greatest thing that being a
journalist has done for me? Has it done things for me? Well, the same thing
that it has offered me – a platform to serve and in serving the society,
sometimes there are little, little benefits here and there and so on and so
forth. But the fact is, it has given me the opportunity to serve, it has given
me a platform, it has made it possible for me to be part of those members of
this society that could possibly shape the agenda of this society. A lot of
people don’t have that platform and they are in millions.
What has being a journalist not done
for you?
Of course, it has not made me rich
(General laughter). In other professions, if I had risen to the level I am
reputed to have reached, then I should be very rich and comfortable. But it has
not done that. But that is also the very nature of the profession. If you are
in this business for the right reason; not for the reason of exploitation and
corruption, you are likely to experience what I’m talking about. But if you are
in it as a platform to exploit, to extort and you have the capacity to do that,
then you could of course make money. But then the more of that you make, the
less of the journalist you become. Because when you extort; if you extort from
ABCD, those people would pass the word around to the members of their class
that you did this, you did that. At the end of the day, it vitiates the respect
accorded your name.
You’ve been into this profession now
for decades, what would you say has sustained you?
The original thing – the sense of
mission and the fact that I’m passionate about it. I don’t know what else I
would have been doing. I’m not good at trading; I can’t really trade
successfully. I love being in this profession; in the writing profession
generally. So, I would say what has sustained me is the devotion and the
passion for it and the fact that I love playing with words, I love trading in
words, dealing in words. It’s an area I will say I have an innate capability
and passion for. Now, that in itself sustains me. Sustains me in the sense that
when I read a good thing, a good article, a good book, it gives me excitement.
Most people attain success in what
they are doing, but find it difficult to sustain it. Where do you think they
get it wrong? Or where do you think they lose track? Especially in our own
business…
Yeah, you see, if you believe your
own PR. If you noticed, most of the places I go, colleagues say ah, you are
this, you are this, you are this… Now, if it gets into your head, it can derail
you. What I’ve learnt is: don’t believe everything people say. They just might
be saying it to appear nice on one hand and two, encomium doesn’t pay house
rent; it does not pay school fees. We need to also know that the fact that a
man is praised, a lot of people are hailing you, is not the ultimate. In all
that, keep your head down, remain humble and drink another cup called a dose of
reality. Always give yourself a reality check. Don’t get carried away and
sometimes, it is good for a man generally. Whether you are a journalist or not,
to say to yourself: where am I now? What have I achieved now? What have I done?
Where have I missed the mark? How can I correct it? What’s my future like? And
what are my prospects? What can I do now? Those questions we should always keep
asking ourselves, because it will help us to get better and it will help us to
re-position ourselves. It is never late to re-position yourself, until you die…
What is the best way for a
journalist to make money from the profession?
Do a damn good journalism and if the
damn good journalism produces money, it helps. Now, the way it goes is this:
journalism in itself is a business. If you are into publishing; publishing in
itself is a business. But journalists, I have learnt, are not often good
businessmen. Because we think that business is somehow beneath us. But it is
the thing that drives the whole journalism enterprise. When we worked in Concord
(Newspapers), we were more of journalists and we spent a disproportionate
measure of time on the journalism side and then when we left Concord, we
now said we will never work for another person. But if we ever do, we must be
in charge. Not only of the journalism, but of the business side. That’s what we
basically did in The Sun…
(Interruption) – But you lost out at
some point?
Of course, we lost out at some point
because em… that is the aspect that brings back the fact that journalists are
not always good businessmen. Because a businessman in our setting is not just
knowing about how to do the business, but knowing about the intricacies, the
politics of it. So, you could say we won on the business side, but we lost out
on the political side. The politics and the intricacies of it. That is because
of this society. In a different society, it probably would have been different.
Well, thank God, the little shares we have, we still earn little, little
dividends from it…
But really, do you have any regret
about the way the whole thing ended up? Your exit from The Sun…
Naturally, there will be regrets,
because we didn’t exit the way we planned. So, naturally, there will be
regrets. But you see, one lesson I learnt: don’t sit in one place, mourning the
past; move on with other things, re-position yourself. It takes us back to what
I said before. It’s never late to re-position yourself and in any case,
directly or indirectly, I’m still part of The Sun, I’m still part of the
organization. I’m a shareholder in the place; I’m the vice chairman of the
place. So, in a way, yes, I’m still part of it. But in terms of whether we left
the way we would have envisaged, no! We didn’t leave the way we would have envisaged
and that in itself is regrettable. But having moved on, we don’t sit, looking
at that and regretting. We are looking forward.
You have done a lot of interviews.
Who would you like to interview, but still haven’t been able to interview?
You see, who we like to interview
depends on the theme, because there are so many people in the world you would
have liked to interview. But when we were doing a book on world editors; it’s a
book we did, which is coming out this year. I hope it comes; the ship should
have berthed. If they clear the book from the wharf, then it should come out
this September we are entering. Now, when we were doing that book…
What’s the title of the book?
World Editors… Conversations With Global Editors On Media Trends And
Best Practices. It’s a book we did for many years and it involves
interviews with editors of global newspapers like The Times of London, New
York Times, The Chicago Tribune, Wall Street Journal, Financial
Times of London. Just name it! All over the world. Some from India, some
from Canada, some from Spain, all over the world. It’s 50 of them. We wanted
desperately to interview Christiana Amanpour and then we went to CNN Atlanta
and we met this our friend there; what’s his name? Jim. We asked and Jim
Clanson said no, she’s in Washington or she’s in New York. I see her as the
world’s No. I reporter. I would have liked to interview her.
Which is the most memorable story
that you have done?
Ah, I wish I knew; I wish I knew.
It’s difficult for me to pick, frankly.
Partnerships hardly work in Nigeria.
But yours and that of Mr. Mike Awoyinfa has been able to last for decades. What
will you say has sustained that relationship, that partnership, that
friendship?
The fundamental reason partnerships
don’t work in Nigeria is greed. You see, when you are starting business with
people, even that day you are starting, they have already plotted how to cheat
you; they have already plotted how to take advantage of you. Partnerships work
if there is the absence of greed. No. 1, if there is contentment. No. 2, if
there is mutual self confidence in each other. After all, what is partnership?
In our own case, it’s a synergy of skills. There is something you have I don’t
have; there is something I have you don’t have. So, we bring the two together
and then we build a stronger capacity simply because we are leveraging on your
strength and leveraging on my strength. There is a saying that success would
come if you don’t mind who takes the credit. It’s also very important. If I’m
doing partnership with you, a little time you say oh, I contributed this, I
contributed that, you begin to audit all those elements; it doesn’t work. It
requires a sense of sacrifice; it requires a sense of commitment. What Mike and
I do; we don’t do that. While I’m here now, Mike is in UK because his son is
graduating (MBA) from one university. So, he’s gone there. And something has
just cropped up – I have an appointment for Thursday. Now, I’m going to do
exactly that which me and him would have done. But I will do it as if it’s two
of us that did it. It didn’t matter that he wasn’t there. You know, those are
just the little, little elements and then you need to trust each other.
What don’t you like about Mr.
Awoyinfa having been with him for a long time?
Well, I call him an iniquity man
(General Laughter) and he knows that. Every day I am chastising him. He moves
around a lot; much more than I would have liked for him to do. I believe that a
writer should be substantially monastic. You should not be a man about town all
the time, because writing is a difficult business. Again, you cannot change
another man. You leave a man to be himself, you recognize who a man is and you
deal with him in the way he is; not the way you would have liked him to be,
which is a figment of your imagination. If you don’t agree with a man’s person,
then go and fight with God who made him.
What do you like most about him?
He’s a simple, nice and honest man.
He’s a very humble person. A man that is simple, a man that is trustworthy. He
won’t lie to me, he won’t cheat and those are the things I like. And he’s a
very creative person. Restless most of the time. But he’s very creative and
with me, he has no ego issues. He has no ego problem and so, it makes it easy.
There is nothing I can’t say to him. If it is wrong or bad, I would not look
for a nice word to say it. I’ll basically say it. He will understand that I am
not saying it because I want to put him down, but because of course I’ve made
sacrifices for him. Enough to warrant the right to tell him off and I would say
vice versa.
What is your take on the coming of
the social media?
It is the thing that has destroyed
the conventional media; it is the thing that created the paralysis that is in
the conventional or the traditional media…
(Interruption) – So, what is the way
out now?
Well, the way out is adaptation. We
need to study it, we need to seek to adapt to it, to see the best that could be
made out of it. It needs to be synthesized, because the way it is, it is coming
with the good, the bad and the ugly. There is so much mud going on in the
social media too. With that, what do we do? It is to sanitize it. To find a way
of sanitizing it; digging something good and leaving those ones that are
worthless. Because if you noticed, they said the school cert. result this year
is the worst. There is one simple reason: if you remove social media, you
remove digital television, you remove BB and Facebook and all that, twitter;
all those members of the social media, if you remove them, then school cert.
result will improve. Because students would then concentrate on reading.
Originally, these things were not there and when a child is idle, he reads.
Children don’t read any more because they are tweeting, they are doing Facebook
and all that.
A lot of people read what you write,
who are the people you read what they write?
Anyone that writes well. I like
people that write with a sense of style. Of course, if you start mentioning
names, you become a bit unfair. But it is just good enough to say I like people
that write with a sense of analytical depth and present their argument with
fairness. I don’t like people that are too partisan; write like writing is war,
like they are fighting with the other side; because me, I try not to write with
anger, I try to balance the odds in different ways. So, if that be the case, I
also like to read people that write that way and then of course, I like a lot
of foreign newspapers. I like the fact that they write with so much confidence
and panache and style and the depth I find in their writings excite me too.
What makes a good publisher?
A good publisher? It’s a complicated
question because publisher as a politician; if you are a politician and you are
a publisher, I would advise you be detached. Get out, allow the professionals
to do the job. A good publisher therefore as a politician should be measured by
the extent of detachment he’s capable of giving his professional staff, team
members. But if you are a publisher as an individual and you are a
professional, then what would make you a good publisher is the nose for
business. You need to understand that what I’m publishing is a product. It’s
not just a newspaper; it is also a product that somebody, a consumer wanna buy
and I must offer the consumer what he wants in this product. So, you constantly
keep asking yourself questions: is there something in this that somebody out
there wants to buy? If I have my money and I have to juggle it between
different options, will I spend it buying this my product? If you have a
product that you would not buy, why do you think another person would buy? So,
it’s all about offering the right values to readers.
Away from work, what do you do for
relaxation? What keeps you busy? What keeps you engaged?
Do I even relax? I’m too busy even
in my idleness, because being a pastor and being a writer, they are two jealous
professions. Each is sucking at the other and there are too many people that
want to see me, too many problems on the ground almost all the time. But if I
do have time to relax, I like to read. I mean, the thing the gives me the
greatest pleasure is to read a nice book.
Who is your favourite author?
Incidentally, I don’t deal with
favourite authors. But the kind of books I read, they are mostly business
books, corporate biographies, political biographies, memoirs. Incidentally,
Mike and I can travel… There are occasions we route our travels through UK
because there are good bookshops there. I know there was a time we could have passed
Dubai. We stopped, because there is a bookshop there where we used to get good
books. In looking for good books in these places, we always go to the media
section. I can now tell you that the media section in most bookshops is small.
Yeah! They are not big. And because we are looking for media books and memoirs
of journalists, we like such books, because it lets you see that what you are
trying to do, people have done it a long time ago. So, the problem you are
facing, somebody has faced it before. That’s the way it goes. So, I don’t deal
with this person or that person is the best. For me, I’m eclectic in the way I
read.
No comments:
Post a Comment