Millions of Nigerians are currently kicking against the Presidency's recent proposal for an upfront deposit of
N1.5billion for a brand new private jet, which will become the
Presidential Air Fleet’s (PAF) 11th aircraft. They see the move as another waste from Aso Rock, which Nigeria does not need now or in the future. This figure is contained
in the details of the 2014 Appropriation Bill presented to the National
Assembly by President Goodluck Jonathan through the Minister of Finance,
Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. The Federal Government has budgeted another
N1.52b for the maintenance of the 10 aircraft currently in the PAF in
2014 and it is now set to spend just about that amount on a new one.
This prodigious squandering of taxpayers’ money is reckless and
unacceptable, according to a report from The Punch.
The PAF already boasts two Falcon 7X jets, two Falcon 900 jets,
Gulfstream 550, one Boeing 737 BBJ (Nigerian Air Force 001 or Eagle
One), and Gulfstream IVSP. Others are one Gulfstream V, Cessna Citation 2
aircraft and Hawker Siddley 125-800 jet. The combined estimated value
of the PAF is about $390.5m (N60.53bn). According to industry experts,
it costs a minimum of 20 per cent of that figure to maintain them
annually. So we’re looking at about $58.57m (N9.08bn) yearly for
maintenance. Private jets are money guzzlers either in the air or on
land.
The proclivity of this administration for frivolous spending is well
documented. The government has been severely criticised in the past for
the colossal amount of embezzlement, rip-off and wastage that have been
its hallmark. The rationale behind this new aircraft in the PAF must be
condemned .
Apparently to hush the cacophony of voices that will rise in
opposition to the proposed new jet, the Presidency in its usual
deceitful manner, has made part payment for what can best be described
as a completely unnecessary toy of comfort. The Nigerian PAF is already
bloated. If he can’t travel in any of the 10 jets in PAF’s possession,
then there’s absolutely no need for an eleventh one.
At a time we would think the numerous editorials and op-eds have
succeeded in curbing waste and frivolities which this government now
symbolises, then came this new proposal. We must continue to resist
their recalcitrance. This lavish lifestyle must be checked.
The waste in government is also demonstrated in the large entourage
that accompanies Mr. President on his foreign trips. One can only
imagine the millions spent on hotel bills and estacodes that accrue to
the government officials. According to reports, world leaders are
stunned at the strangely large number of such entourage. The recent trip
of President Jonathan in the first week of January this year to Kenya
and the hullabaloo about his entourage are apt.
It is shocking that the same people who have budgeted millions for
this new flying toy are aware that the country has no national carrier
as I write. It is shameful that the PAF has about the third largest
fleet of aircraft in the country with a total of 10 aircraft, coming
closely behind Aero Contractors with 12 and Arik Air, the largest
commercial airline in Nigeria with a fleet of 23 aircraft. Nigeria
happens to be one of the few countries in the world with such a large
PAF. It is ridiculous that this is happening in an aviation sector that
is dominated by foreign airlines. Nigerian carriers are going under due
to cash constraints. Countries with visionary and focused leadership
like Malaysia, Ghana, South Africa and a host of others across Europe
maintain only one aircraft in their PAF.
As the much publicised take-off of the proposed national carrier
before the end of the year failed, it won’t be out of place to make a
case for the government to seriously consider converting the PAF to a
national carrier, retaining one or two for use by Mr. President and his
co-travellers. The private jets can form the hub of the charter
aircraft.
What better example than the one given by a national leader like
British Prime Minister, David Cameron, in 2010 when he slummed it in
business class of a commercial airline flying from London to Washington.
He was caught on camera swanning around the world in hired jets. He
flies around the world on British Airways! Had it been in Nigeria,
security risks, flight delays are few of the sundry reasons government
officials would have given for not flying commercial airlines. The U.S.
President, Barack Obama, reportedly pays for his food, ours spends
almost a billion naira to entertain himself and members of his
government yearly.
It amazes many Nigerians who watch in utter disbelief the profligate nature of government.
This government has embarked on some white elephants like mere
renovation of official residences with billions of naira. We can recall
the uproar that greeted the N2.2billion allocated to the construction of
a plush banqueting hall, last year, with the lame excuse that what the
country had was way smaller than what other tiny African countries have.
In this part of the world, only citizens are asked to cut costs, make
sacrifices; the pains of today are incomparable to the joy of tomorrow
are some of the ‘blues’ we get daily from government. In the same
breath, political office holders, to our chagrin, take their spending to
absurd heights. Sacrifice is a language that the over 60 per cent
impoverished population must understand while our leaders continue their
obsession with living in opulence. They sacrifice nothing. In these
circumstances, how do you convince the various labour unions who are
waiting on the flanks to embark on strike to press home their demands
that there are no funds to meet their grievances? Downturn in
government’s finances would be a hard sell in a situation where the
Presidency is competing with individuals for private jets.
It is lamentable that at a time when we still haven’t seen the
infrastructural dividends promised with funds freed up from the partial
fuel subsidy removed, the President is more concerned with splashing
billions on banqueting hall, renovation of residential apartments and
covert medical tourism trips abroad.
This waste in the face of limited resources extends to the federal
bureaucracy that has brought about an increase in the number of
ministries from 21 to about 40 with the number of ministers jumping in
equal quantum or even more
No comments:
Post a Comment